Energy Companies Pursue Incidental Take Permit for Five Bat Species


In December 2016, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service held five public meetings to discuss a proposal by nine oil and natural gas companies for an incidental take permit related to five bat species in Appalachia. If approved, the incidental take permit would exempt future oil and natural gas development operations conducted by the nine companies from the Endangered Species Act’s prohibition on incidental takes of threatened or endangered species. The meetings were intended to assist the Service in gathering public input as the environmental review process begins to determine the potential impacts of issuing the incidental take permit.

If approved, the Service would issue a 50-year incidental take permit as part of a habitat conservation plan proposed by the oil and natural gas companies. The proposed habitat conservation plan includes measures to ensure that impacts from incidental takes of covered species and impacts to those species’ habitats will be minimized and mitigated to the maximum extent practicable. If approved, the incidental take permit would cover a wide spectrum of oil and natural gas activities, including activities associated with access roads, staging areas, seismic operations, well pads, drilling rigs, waterlines, disposal wells, impoundments, gathering and midstream pipelines, well pad restoration, and well plugging.

Since 2006, certain bat species have suffered devastating effects from white-nose syndrome, a fungus that inhibits normal hibernating activities. Hibernacula with white-nose syndrome have mortality rates between 90-100%, and the disease was the predominant reason why the Service listed the Northern Long-Eared Bat as threatened on January 14, 2016.

On January 17, 2017, the U.S. Geologic Survey published “Effects of Wind Energy Generation and White-Nose Syndrome on the Viability of the Indiana Bat,” a study that examined the combined impact of wind turbine collisions and white-nose syndrome on Indiana Bat populations in the midwestern United States.
Wednesday, January 18, 2017

18 States Challenge USFWS Rulemaking


On November 29, 2016, 18 states filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama to challenge two final rules published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on February 11, 2016. The states allege that the final rulemakings exceed the authority given to USFWS in the Endangered Species Act.


In their complaint, the states allege that the final rulemakings erode the distinctions between occupied and unoccupied critical habitat mandated by the ESA. Specifically, the states allege that USFWS may only designate areas unoccupied by an endangered species as critical habitat “when a designation limited to [the species’] present range would be inadequate to ensure the conservation of the species.” The states allege that the final rulemakings allow USFWS to designate areas as “occupied critical habitat” even if the areas are not occupied and are not capable of supporting the species.


The case is State of Alabama v. Nat. Marine Fisheries Serv., 1:16-cv-00593 (S.D. Ala. Filed Nov. 29, 2016).  

Tuesday, December 06, 2016

Recent Posts

Tags

Archive

The Oil & Gas Law Blog is made available for educational purposes only and to give you general information as well as a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. Use of this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and any of the blog contributors or Harris Finley & Bogle. The Oil & Gas Law Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.